Automated, non-invasive iris recognition system and method

ABSTRACT

Iris recognition is achieved by (1) iris acquisition that permits a user to self-position his or her eye into an imager&#39;s field of view without the need for any physical contact, (2) spatially locating the data defining that portion of a digitized video image of the user&#39;s eye that defines solely the iris thereof without any initial spatial condition of the iris being provided, and (3) pattern matching the spatially located data defining the iris of the user&#39;s eye with stored data defining a model iris by employing normalized spatial correlation for first comparing, at each of a plurality of spatial scales, each of distinctive spatial characteristics of the respective irises that are spatially registered with one another to quantitatively determine, at each of the plurality of spatial scales, a goodness value of match at that spatial scale, and then judging whether or not the pattern which manifests solely the iris of the user&#39;s eye matches the digital data which manifests solely the model iris in accordance with a certain combination of the quantitatively-determined goodness values of match at each of said plurality of spatial scales.

The United States Government has rights in this invention under agovernment contract.

The invention relates to a system and method for iris recognition.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The prior art includes various technologies for uniquely identifying anindividual person in accordance with an examination of particularattributes of either the person's interior or exterior eye. The priorart also includes a technology for eye tracking image pickup apparatusfor separating noise from feature portions, such as that disclosed inU.S. Pat. No. 5,016,282, issued to Tomono et al. on May 14, 1991. One ofthese prior-art technologies involves the visual examination of theparticular attributes of the exterior of the iris of at least one of theperson's eyes. In this regard, reference is made to U.S. Pat. No.4,641,349 issued to Flom et al. on Feb. 3, 1987, U.S. Pat. No.5,291,560, issued to Daugman on Mar. 1, 1994, and to Daugman's article"High Confidence Visual Recognition of Persons by a Test of StatisticalIndependence", which appears on pages 1148-1161 of the IEEE Transactionson Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Volume 15, No. 11, Nov.1993. As made clear by the aforesaid patents and article, the visibletexture of a person's iris can be used to distinguish one person fromanother with great accuracy. Thus, iris recognition may be used for suchpurposes as controlling access to a secure facility or an AutomatedTransaction Machine (ATM) for dispensing cash, by way of examples. Aniris recognition system involves the use of an imager to video image theiris of each person attempting access and computer-vision imageprocessing means for comparing this iris video image with a referenceiris image on file in a database. For instance, the person attemptingaccess may first enter a personal identification number (PIN), therebypermitting the video image of the iris of that person to be associatedwith his or her reference iris image on file. In addition, an irisrecognition system is useful for such purposes as medical diagnostics inthe medical examination of the exterior eye.

From a practical point of view, there are problems with prior-art irisrecognition systems and methods.

First, previous approaches to acquiring high quality images of the irisof the eye have: (i) an invasive positioning device (e.g., a head restor bite bar) serving to bring the subject of interest into a knownstandard configuration; (ii) a controlled light source providingstandardized illumination of the eye, and (iii) an imager serving tocapture the positioned and illuminated eye. There are a number oflimitations with this standard setup, including: (a) users find thephysical contact required for positioning to be unappealing, and (b) theillumination level required by these previous approaches for the captureof good quality, high contrast images can be annoying to the user.

Second, previous approaches to localizing the iris in images of the eyehave employed parameterized models of the iris. The parameters of thesemodels are iteratively fit to an image of the eye that has been enhancedso as to highlight regions corresponding to the iris boundary. Thecomplexity of the model varies from concentric circles that delimit theinner and outer boundaries of the iris to more elaborate modelsinvolving the effects of partially occluding eyelids. The methods usedto enhance the iris boundaries include gradient based edge detection aswell as morphological filtering. The chief limitations of theseapproaches include their need for good initial conditions that serve asseeds for the iterative fitting process as well as extensivecomputational expense.

Third, previous approaches to pattern match a localized iris data imagederived from the video image of a person attempting to gain access withthat of one or more reference localized iris data images on file in adatabase provide reasonable discrimination between these iris dataimages., but require extensive computational expense

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention is directed to an improved system and method that providesa solution to disadvantages associated one or more of the aforesaidthree approaches with prior-art iris recognition systems and methods.

The solution to the first of the aforesaid three approaches comprises anon-invasive alignment mechanism that may be implemented by a largerfirst edge and a smaller second edge having geometrically similar shapesthat are substantially centered about and spaced at different distancesfrom an imager lens to permit a user to self-position his or her eyeinto an imager's field of view without the need for any physical contactwith the system by maneuvering his or her eye to that point in spacewhere, due to perspective, the smaller edge substantially totallyoccludes the larger edge.

The solution to the second of the aforesaid three approaches comprisesdelimiting digital data to that portion of a digitized image of the eyeof an individual that defines solely the iris of the eye of theindividual by image-filtering at least one of the limbic boundary of theiris, the pupilary boundary of said iris, and the boundaries of saideye's upper and lower eyelids to derive an enhanced image thereof, andthen histogramming the enhanced image by means that embody a votingscheme. This results in the recovery of the iris boundaries withoutrequiring knowledge of any initial conditions other than the digitaldata representative of the individual's eye.

The solution to the third of the aforesaid three approaches comprises apattern-matching technique for use in providing automated irisrecognition for security access control. The pattern-matching technique,which is responsive to first digital data defining a digitized image ofsolely the iris of the eye of a certain individual attempting access andpreviously stored second digital data of a digitized image that definessolely the iris of the eye of a specified individual, employs normalizedspatial correlation for first comparing, at each of a plurality ofspatial scales, each of distinctive spatial characteristics of therespective irises of the given individual and the specified individualthat are spatially registered with one another to quantitativelydetermine, at each of the plurality of spatial scales, a goodness valueof match at that spatial scale. Whether or not the pattern of thedigital data which manifests solely the iris of said eye of the givenindividual matches the digital data which manifests solely the iris ofan eye of the specified individual is judged in accordance with acertain combination of the quantitatively-determined goodness values ofmatch at each of the plurality of spatial scales.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING

FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram of an automated, non-invasive irisrecognition system incorporating the principles of the invention;

FIG. 2 illustrates an embodiment of iris acquisition means incorporatingprinciples of the invention;

FIGS. 2a and 2b together illustrate a modification of the irisacquisition means of FIG. 2 for enhancing the embodiment thereof; and

FIG. 3 illustrates the flow of computational steps employed by theinvention for automatically processing an input image of an iris toprovide complete iris localization.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In FIG. 1, an automated, non-invasive iris recognition system of theinvention comprises iris acquisition means 100 (shown in more detail inFIG. 2) for deriving an input image, typically a video image, of theiris of a person (hereafter referred to as the "user") attempting to berecognized by the system as being a certain predetermined person; irislocalization means 102 (employing the computational steps shown in FIG.3) for automatically processing an input image of an iris to providecomplete localization of the video input image of the iris appliedthereto from iris acquisition means 100; and pattern matching means 104for automatically comparing the pattern of the localized irisinformation applied thereto from means 102 with the pattern of a storedmodel iris 106 of the certain predetermined person, and concluding withhigh accuracy whether the user is, in fact, the certain predeterminedperson.

Iris acquisition means 100, as shown in FIG. 2, comprises imager 200,such as a video camera, an array of light sources 202, diffuser 204,circular polarizer 206, larger square edge 208, smaller square edge 210,and image frame grabber 212.

Imager 200 is typically a low light level video camera, such as asilicon intensified target (SIT) camera having an optical componentcomprising a telephoto/macro lens 214, which points through a hole inthe center of diffuser 204 so that lens 214 does not interfere withimager 200 obtaining a clear image. Lens 214 permits a high resolutionimage to be obtained of an eye 216 of the user, who is positioned asubstantial distance in front of lens 214, so that extreme proximitybetween eye 216 and imager 200 is not required.

Light from the array of light sources 202, which surround imager 200,passes through diffuser 204 and polarizer 206 to illuminate an eye 216of the user who is positioned in front of polarizer 206. Diffuser 204 isa diffusing panel that operates as a first filter which serves thepurposes of both providing uniform illumination of eye 216 andintegrating radiant energy over a wide region at eye 216 in order toallow for an amount of light intensity to be distributed across theuser's view that would be annoying if the same energy was concentratedin a single point source. Polarizer 206, which is situated in front oflens 214, operates as a second filter which ameliorates the effects ofspecular reflection at the cornea that would otherwise obfuscate theunderlying structure of eye 216. More specifically, light emerging frompolarizer 206 will have a particular sense of rotation. When this lighthits a specularly reflecting surface (e.g., the cornea) the light thatis reflected back will still be polarized, but have a reversed sense.This reversed sense light will not be passed back through polarizer 206and is thereby blocked to the view of imager 200. However, light hittingdiffusely reflecting parts of the eye (e.g., the iris) will scatter theimpinging light and this light will be passed back through polarizer 206and subsequently be available for image formation. It should be notedthat, strictly speaking, circular polarization is accomplished vialinear polarization followed by a quarter wave retarder; therefore, itis necessarily tuned for only a particular wavelength range.

As shown in FIG. 2, both larger and smaller square edges 208 and 210 arecentered in position with respect to the axis of lens 214, with largersquare edge 208 being displaced a relatively shorter distance in frontof polarizer 206 and smaller square edge 210 being displaced arelatively longer distance in front of polarizer 206. These square edges208 and 210 are useful as an alignment mechanism for the purpose ofpermitting the user to self-position his or her eye 216 into the fieldof view of imager 200 without the need for any physical contact with thesystem. The goal for positioning is to constrain the three translationaldegrees of freedom of the object to be imaged (i.e., eye 216) so that itis centered on the sensor array (not shown) of imager 200 and at adistance that lies in the focal plane of lens 214. This is accomplishedby simple perspective geometry to provide cues to the user so that he orshe can maneuver to the point in space that satisfies these conditions.In particular, as shown by dashed lines 220, due to perspective, thereis only one spatial position of eye 216 in which the square outlinecontour of smaller square edge 210 will totally occlude the squareoutline contour of larger square edge 208. This spatial position is asubstantially longer distance in front of polarizer 206 than is smallersquare edge 208. The relative sizes and distances between square edges208 and 210 are chosen so that when the eye is appropriately positioned,their square contours overlap and misalignment of the smaller and largersquare edges 208 and 210 provides continuous feedback for the userregarding the accuracy of the current position of alignment of his orher eye. This alignment procedure may be referred to as Vernieralignment in analogy with the human's Vernier acuity, the ability toalign thin lines and other small targets with hyperprecision.

Further, while both larger and smaller edges 208 and 210 of thepreferred embodiment shown in FIG. 2 have square outline contour shapes,it should be understood that the outline contour of these larger andsmaller edges may have geometrically similar shapes other than square,such that, when the eye is appropriately positioned, their geometricallysimilar contours overlap and misalignment of the smaller and largeredges provides continuous feedback for the user regarding the accuracyof the current position of alignment of his or her eye.

In any case, imager 200, which receives a precisely focusedlight-intensity image (having negligible specular-reflection noise) ofthe user's eye 216, derives successive video frames of this eye image.Frame grabber 212 (which is a standard digital frame grabber) stores theeye image defined by a selected one of the video frames. This stored eyeimage from frame grabber 212 is then forwarded to means 102 (shown inFIG. 2) for iris localization.

For illustrative purposes, assume that the user is either attemptingaccess to a secure facility or, alternatively, attempting access to anATM. In either case, the user, after first employing square edges 208and 210 in the manner described above to self-position his or her eye216 into the field of view of imager 200 without the need for anyphysical contact with the system, then may push a button (not shown)causing frame grabber 212 to store the eye image defined by thecurrently-occurring video frame derived from imager 200. Thus, theoperation of pushing the button by the user is similar to that of a useroperating the shutter of a still camera to record a snapshot of a sceneon the film of the still camera.

The structure shown in FIG. 2 and described above constitutes a basicembodiment of iris acquisition means 100. However, because differentusers vary in size and facial features from one another, it is desirableto enhance the structure of iris acquisition means 100 so that theposition of the image of any user's eye viewed by the imager and storedby the frame grabber is independent of that user's particular size andfacial features, for ease of use and to provide for the possibility ofcovert image capture. Further, in controlling access to a securefacility, it is desirable to provide video camera surveillance of thearea in the general vicinity that a user employs to self-position his orher eye into the field of view of the imager, as well as to provideadditional visual information that can be used to identify a userattempting access. FIGS. 2a and 2b together illustrate a modification ofthe structure of means 100 that provides such enhancements.

As shown in FIG. 2a, the modification of the structure of irisacquisition means 100 includes low-resolution imager 222 having arelatively wide field of view for deriving image 224 of at least thehead of user 226 then attempting access. The modification also includeshigh-resolution imager 228 having a relatively narrow field of view thatis controlled by the position of active mirror 230 for deriving image232 of an eye of user 226 (where imager 228 corresponds to imager 200 ofFIG. 2). Image processing means of the type shown in FIG. 2b, describedbelow, uses information contained in successive video frames of imager222 to control the adjustment of the position of active mirror 230 inaccordance with prior-art teachings disclosed in one or more of U.S.Pat. No. 4,692,806, issued to Anderson et al. on Sep. 8, 1987; U.S. Pat.No. 5,063,603, issued to Burt on Nov. 19, 1991; and U.S. Pat. No.5,067,014, issued to Bergen et al. on Sep. 8, 1987, all of which areincorporated herein by reference.

More specifically, the modification of iris acquisition means 100involves active image acquisition and tracking of the human head, faceand eye for recognizing the initial position of an operator's head (aswell as its component facial features, e.g., eyes and iris) andsubsequent tracking. The approach utilized by the modification, whichmakes use of image information derived by imager 222, decomposes thematter into three parts. The first part is concerned with crudelocalization and tracking of the head and its component features. Thesecond part is concerned with using the crude localization and trackinginformation to zoom in on and refine the positional and temporalestimates of the eye region, especially the iris. The third part isconcerned with motion tracking.

The first part of eye localization is a mechanism for alerting thesystem that a potential user is present, and also for choosing candidatelocations where the user might be. Such an alerting mechanism is thechange-energy pyramid, shown in FIG. 2b (discussed in more detailbelow), where images recorded at a time interval are differenced andsquared. Change energy at different resolutions is produced using aGaussian pyramid on the differenced, squared images. Change is analyzedat coarse resolution, and if present can alert the system that apotential user is entering the imagers field of view. Other alertingmechanisms include stereo, where the proximity of the user is detectedby computing disparity between two images recorded from two positions,and alerting the system to objects that are nearby.

The second part of eye localization is a mechanism for initiallylocalizing the head and eyes of the user. Localization is performedusing a pattern-tree which comprises a model of a generic user, forexample, a template of a head at a coarse resolution, and templates forthe eyes, nose and mouth. The alerting mechanism gives candidatepositions for a template matching process that matches the image withthe model. Initially matching is done at a coarse resolution to locatecoarse features such as the head, and subsequently fine resolutionfeatures, such as the eyes, nose and mouth, are located usinginformation from the coarse resolution match.

The third part of eye localization is to track the head and eyes once inview. This is done using a motion tracker which performs a correlationmatch between a previous image frame and the current frame. Thecorrelation match is done on the features used for eye localization, butcan also be performed on other features, such as hair, that are usefulfor tracking over short time intervals, but vary from person to person.

The result of the three previous parts provides the location of the eyein image 224 from imager 222 and, if stereo is used, the approximaterange of the eye. This information is used by active mirror 230 to pointimager 228 toward the eye to capture an image. Given the position of theeye in the image 224, its approximate range, and a known geometrybetween imager 222 and the imager 228, the pointing direction to capturethe eye using imager 228 can be easily computed. If the range of the eyeis unknown, then imager 228 is pointed to a position corresponding tothe approximate expected range, from which it points to positionscorresponding to ranges surrounding the expected range. If imager 228and imager 222 are configured to be optically aligned, then only theimage location of the eye in image 224 is necessary to point imager 228.Once imager 228 has been initially pointed to the eye, images fromimager 228 are used to keep the eye in the field of view. This is tocompensate for eye saccades, and normal movement of the user. Suchmovements will appear insignificant in images, such as image 224, fromimager 222, but will appear significant in images, such as image 232,from imager 228. The tracking procedure is the same as that describedfor tracking the head and eyes, except the features used in images, suchas image 232, of the user's eye are the eye's pupil, limbal boundary,and texture corresponding to the eyelid.

Referring to FIG. 2b, there is shown a functional block diagram of animage processor responsive to images from imager 222 for controlling theposition of active mirror 230 so that image 232 of the eye of user 226is in the view of imager 228.

Specifically, the video signal output from imager 222, representingsuccessive frames of image 224, is applied, after being digitized, as aninput G₀ to Gaussian pyramid 234. Input G₀ is forwarded, with suitabledelay, to an output of Gaussian pyramid 234 to provide a G₀ image 236 ofan image pyramid at the same resolution and sampling density as image224. Further, as known in the pyramid art, Gaussian pyramid 234 includescascaded convolution and subsampling stages for derivingreduced-resolution G₁ output image 238 and G₂ output image 240 of theimage pyramid as outputs from Gaussian pyramid 234.

The respective G₀, G₁, and G₂ outputs of Gaussian pyramid 234 aredelayed a given number of one or more frame periods by frame delay 242.Subtractor 244 provides the difference between the polarized amplitudeof corresponding pixels of the current and frame-delayed frames of eachof G₀, G₁, and G₂ as an output therefrom, thereby minimizing theamplitude of stationary image objects with respect to the amplitude ofmoving object images. This minimization is magnified and polarity iseliminated by squaring the output from subtractor 244 (as indicated byblock 246) to provide a G₀, G₁, and G₂ change energy pyramid (asindicated by respective blocks 248, 250 and 252). The change energypyramid information, in a coarse-to-fine process known in the art, maythen be used to control the position of active mirror 230 of FIG. 2a.

In addition, the modification may employ template matching, such astaught in aforesaid U.S. Pat. No. 5,063,603, for object recognition.Alternatively, crude localization and tracking could be based on afeature-based algorithm, such as disclosed in aforesaid U.S. Pat. No.4,692,806, rather than template matching to provide similar information.Further, the modification could operate in an opportunistic fashion byacquiring a sequence of images until one with quality adequate forsubsequent operations has been obtained. Alternatively, from such asequence, pieces of the region of interest could be acquired acrossframes and subsequently mosaiced together to yield a single image ofadequate quality. Also, any of these modification approaches could beused to zoom in on and acquire high resolution images of facial featuresother than the eye and iris. For example, high resolution images of thelips of an operator could be obtained in an analogous fashion.

The system of the iris acquisition means shown in FIG. 2, either with orwithout the enhancement provided by the modification of FIGS. 2a and 2b,could be generalized in a number of ways. First, the system couldoperate in spectral bands other than the visible (e.g., near infrared).Thus, the term "light", as used herein, includes light radiation in boththe visible and nonvisible spectral bands. In order to accomplish this,the spectral distribution of the illuminant as well as the wavelengthtuning of the quarter wave retarder must be matched to the desiredspectral band. Second, the system could make use of a standard videocamera (replacing the low light level camera), although a more intenseilluminant would need to be employed. Third, other choices could be madefor the lens system, including the use of an auto-focus zoom lens. Thisaddition would place less of a premium on the accuracy with which theuser deploys the Vernier alignment procedure. Fourth, otherinstantiations of the Vernier alignment procedure could be used. Forexample, pairs of lights could be projected in such a fashion that theywould be seen as a single spot if the user is in the correct positionand double otherwise. Fifth, in place of (or in addition to) the passiveVernier alignment mechanism, the system could be coupled with an activetracking imager and associated software (such as that described above inconnection with FIGS. 2a and 2b) that automatically locates and tracksthe eye of the user. This generalization would place less of a premiumon having a cooperative user.

The output from iris acquisition means 100, which is applied as an inputto iris localization means 102, comprises data in digital form thatdefines a relatively high-resolution eye image that corresponds to theparticular video frame stored in frame grabber 212. FIG. 3diagrammatically shows the sequence of the successive data processingsteps performed by iris localization means 102 on the eye image dataapplied as an input thereto.

More specifically, input image 300 represents the relativelyhigh-resolution eye image data that is applied as an input to irislocalization means 102 from iris acquisition means 100. The first dataprocessing step 302 is to average and reduce input image 300. This isaccomplished by convolving the data defining input image 300 with alow-pass Gaussian filter that serves to spatially average and therebyreduce high frequency noise. Since spatial averaging introducesredundancy in the spatial domain, the filtered image is next subsampledwithout any additional loss of information. The subsampled image servesas the basis for subsequent processing with the advantage that itssmaller dimensions and lower resolution leads to fewer computationaldemands compared to the original, full size, input image 300.

The next data processing steps involved in localizing the iris consistof the sequential location of various components of the iris boundary.In sequence, step 304 locates the limbic (or outer) boundary of theiris, step 306 locates the pupilary (or inner) boundary of the iris, andstep 308 locates the boundaries of the eyelids (which might be occludinga portion of the iris). This ordering has been chosen based on therelative salience of the involved image features as well as on theability of located components to constrain the location of additionalcomponents. The localization step of each component is performed in twosub-steps. The first sub-step consists of an edge detection operationthat is tuned to the expected configuration of high contrast imagelocations. This tuning is based on generic properties of the boundarycomponent of interest (e.g., orientation) as well as on specificconstraints that are provided by previously isolated boundarycomponents. The second sub-step consists of a scheme where the detectededge pixels vote to instantiate particular values for a parameterizedmodel of the boundary component of interest. Most simply, this step canbe thought of in terms of a generalized tough transform as disclosed inU.S. Pat. No. 3,069,654, issued to P. V. C. Hough on Dec. 18, 1962,incorporated by reference.

In more detail, for the limbic boundary in step 304, the image isfiltered with a gradient-based edge detector that is tuned inorientation so as to favor near verticality. This directionalselectivity is motivated by the fact that even in the face of occludingeyelids, the left and right portions of the limbus should be clearlyvisible and oriented near the vertical. (This assumes that the head isin an upright position). The limbic boundary is modeled as a circleparameterized by its two center coordinates, xc and yc, and its radius,r. The detected edge pixels are thinned and then histogrammed into athree-dimensional (xc, yc, r)-space, according to permissible (xc, yc,r) values for a given (x, y) image location. The (xc, yc, r) point withthe maximal number of votes is taken to represent the limbic boundary.The only additional constraint imposed on this boundary is that it lieswithin the given image of the eye.

In more detail, for the pupilary boundary in step 306, the image isfiltered with a gradient-based edge detector that is not directionallytuned. The pupilary boundary is modeled as a circle, similar to thelimbic boundary. The parameters of the circle again are instantiated interms of the most number of votes received as the edge pixels arethinned and then histogrammed into permissible (xc,yc,r) values. For thecase of the pupil the permissible parameter values are constrained tolie within the circle that describes the limbic boundary.

In more detail, for the eyelid boundaries in step 308, the image isfiltered with a gradient-based edge detector that is tuned inorientation so as to favor the horizontal. This directional selectivityis motivated by the fact that the portion of the eyelid (if any) that iswithin the limbic boundary should be nearly horizontal. (Again, thisassumes that the head is upright). The upper and lower eyelids aremodeled as (two separate) parabolic, i.e., second-order, arcs.Particular values for the parameterization are instantiated as thedetected edge pixels are thinned and then histogrammed according totheir permissible values. For the eyelids case, the detected boundariesare additionally constrained to be within the circle that specifies thelimbic boundary and above or below the pupil for the upper and lowereyelids, respectively.

Finally, with the various components of the iris boundary isolated, thefinal processing step 310 consists of combining these components so asto delimit the iris, per se. This is accomplished by taking the iris asthat portion of the image that is outside the pupil boundary, inside thelimbic boundary, below the upper eyelid and above the lower eyelid.

The above-described approach to iris localization could be generalizedin a number of ways. First, image representations other than orientedgradient-based edge detection could be used for enhancing irisboundaries. Second, alternative parameterizations for the iris boundarycould be employed. Third, localization of various components of the irisboundary (limbic, pupilary and eyelid boundaries) could be performed indifferent orders, or in parallel. Fourth, alternative constraints,including absence of constraints, could be enforced in specifying therelative configuration of the components of the iris boundary. Fifth,the fit of the parameterized models of the iris boundary could beperformed across multiple resolutions, e.g., in an iterativecoarse-to-fine fashion. Sixth, iris boundary localization could beperformed without the initial steps of spatial averaging andsubsampling.

The benefit of the above-described approach to iris localization of aninput eye image (particularly, as exemplified by the sequential dataprocessing steps shown in FIG. 3) is that it requires no additionalinitial conditions and that it can be implemented employing simplefiltering operations (that enhance relevant image structures) andhistogramming operations (that embodies a voting scheme for recoveringthe iris boundaries from the enhanced image) that incur littlecomputational expense.

As shown in FIG. 1, the processed data output from iris localizationmeans 102, representing the image of solely the localized iris of theuser, is applied as a first input to pattern matching means 104, whileselected data, previously stored in a database, that represents a modelof the image of solely the localized iris 106 of the person whom theuser purports to be is applied as a second input to pattern matchingmeans 104. Means 104 employs principles of the invention to efficientlyprocess the first and second input data thereto to determine whether ornot there is a match sufficient to indicate the user is, in fact, theperson whom he or she purports to be.

More specifically, the distinctive spatial characteristics of the humaniris are manifest at a variety of scales. For example, distinguishingstructures range from the overall shape of the iris to the distributionof tiny crypts and detailed texture. To capture this range of spatialstructures, the iris image is represented in terms of a 2D bandpasssignal decomposition. Preliminary empirical studies lead to theconclusion that acceptable discrimination between iris images could bebased on octave-wide bands computed at four different resolutions thatare implemented by means of Laplacian pyramids to capture thisinformation. This makes for efficient storage and processing as lowerfrequency bands are subsampled successively without loss of information.

In order to make a detailed comparison between two images it isadvantageous to establish a precise correspondence betweencharacteristic structures across the pair. An area-based imageregistration technique is used for this purpose. This technique seeksthe mapping function (u(x,y),v(x,y)), such that, for all (x,y), thepixel value at (x,y)-(u(x,y),v(x,y)) in the data image is close to thatat (x,y) in the model image. Here, (x,y) are taken over the imageregions that are localized as the iris by the iris localizationtechnique described herein. Further, the mapping function is constrainedto be a similarity transformation, i.e., translational shift, scale androtation. This allows the observed degrees of freedom between variousimaged instances of the same iris to be compensated for. Shift accountsfor offsets in the plane parallel to the imager's sensor array. Scaleaccounts for offsets along the camera's optical axis. Rotation accountsfor deviation in rotation about the optical axis beyond that notnaturally compensated for by cyclotorsion of the eye. Given the abilityto accurately position the person attempting access, as described abovein connection with image acquisition, these prove to be the only degreesof freedom that need to be addressed in establishing correspondence.This approach has been implemented in terms of a hierarchicalgradient-based image registration algorithm employing model-based motionestimation known in the art. Initial conditions for the algorithm arederived from the relative offset of iris boundaries located by the irislocalization technique described above.

With the model and data images accurately and precisely registered, thenext task is to assign a goodness of match to quantify the comparison.Given the system's ability to bring model and data images into fineregistration, an appropriate match metric can be based on integratingpixel differences over spatial position within each frequency band ofthe image representation. Spatial correlation captures this notion. Morespecifically, normalized correlation is made use of. Normalizedcorrelation captures the same type of information as standardcorrelation; however, it also accounts for local variations in imageintensity that corrupt standard correlation, as known in the art. Thecorrelations are performed over small blocks of pixels (8×8) in eachspatial frequency band. A goodness of match subsequently is derived foreach band by combining the block correlation values via the medianstatistic. Blocking combined with the median operation allows for localadjustments of matching and a degree of outlier detection and therebyprovides robustness against mismatches due to noise, misregistration andocclusion (e.g., a stray eyelash).

The final task that must be performed is to combine the four goodness ofmatch values that have been computed (one for each spatial frequencyband) into a final judgment as to whether the data image comes from thesame iris as does the model image. A reasonable approach to this matteris to combine the values in a fashion so that the variance within aclass of iris images (i.e., various instances of the same iris) isminimized, while the variance between different classes of iris images(i.e., instances of different irises) is maximized. A linear functionthat provides such a solution is well known and is given by Fisher'sLinear Discriminant. This technique has been disclosed, among others, byDuda and Hart in "Pattern Classification And Scene Analysis", John Wiley& Sons, 1973, pages 1114-118. While it is not a foregone conclusion thatany linear function can properly distinguish different classes ofarbitrary data sets, it has been found that, in practice, it works quitewell in the case of iris images. Further, in practice, Fishers LinearDiscriminant, has been defined based on a small set of iris imagetraining data comprising 5 images of 10 irises). Subsequently, inpractice, this function has made for excellent discrimination betweenincoming data images that have a corresponding database entry and thosethat do not.

It is to be understood that the apparatus and method of operation taughtherein are illustrative of the invention. Modifications may readily bedevised by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit orscope of the invention. In particular, methods of registration otherthan similarity may be used. Image representations other than thosederived via application of isotropic bandpass filtering could serve asthe basis for correlation. For example, oriented bandpass filtering,such as that disclosed by Burt et al in U.S. Pat. No. 5,325,449 issuedJun. 28, 1994, incorporated herein by reference, or morphologicalfiltering could be used. Other signal decomposition methods thanbandpass such as wavelet decomposition can be used. A waveletdecomposition is a specific type of multiresolution pyramid that usesquadrature mirror filters (QMF) to produce subband decompositions of anoriginal image representative video signal. A signal processor of thistype is described by Pentland et al. in "A Practical Approach toFractal-Based Image Compression", Proceedings of the DCC '91 DataCompression Conference, Apr. 8-11, 1991, IEEE Computer Society Press,Los Alamitos, Calif. The Pentland et al. compression system attempts touse low frequency coarse scale information to predict significantinformation at high frequency finer scales. QMF subband pyramidprocessing also is described in the book "Subband Image Coding", J. W.Woods, ed., Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991. Alternatively, an orientedbandpass such as that disclosed by Burt et al in U.S. Pat. No. 5,325,449issued Jun. 28, 1994, could be used.

Image matching could be performed in a more symbolic fashion. Forexample, multiple derived match values could be combined in mannersother than those given by Fisher's Linear Discriminant. For example, anon-linear combination (e.g., derived with a neural network) could beused. Other comparison methods than correlation and other decisioncriteria than Fisher's Linear Discriminant can also be used.

Alternative methods could be used for aligning the irises that are beingcompared. For example, the images can be aligned subject to eithersimpler or more complex image transformations. Prior to the actualmatching procedure the annular iris images could be converted to arectangular format, e.g., with radial and angular position converted tovertical and horizontal. Such manipulation would serve to simplifycertain subsequent operations. Prior to the actual matching procedurethe iris images could be projected along some direction to yield aone-dimensional signal. For example, the images could be projected alongthe radial directions.

The invention can be used to control access to an area, facility or adevice such as computer or an ATM or in biometric assessment.

We claim:
 1. In a system including an imager having a lens for deriving a focused image of an eye of a user of the system; the improvement comprising:alignment means for permitting said user to self-position his or her eye into said imager's field of view without the need for any physical contact with said system, said alignment means comprises:(a) first edge means having a given outline contour shape of a first given size that is substantially centered with respect to said lens, said first edge means being disposed a first distance in front of said lens; and (b) second edge means having an outline contour shape of a second given size smaller than said first given size that is geometrically similar in shape to said given outline contour shape and is substantially centered with respect to said lens, said second edge means being disposed a second distance in front of said lens that is longer than said first distance by a specified amount, said specified amount being such that said lens forms a focused image of said user's eye when said user's eye is maneuvered to a point in space in front of said lens at which said outline contour of said first edge means is substantially totally occluded by said outline contour of said second edge means as viewed by said user's eye from the point.
 2. The system of claim 1, wherein:said given outline contour shape of said first edge means is square; whereby said geometrically similar outline contour shape of said second edge means is also square.
 3. The system of claim 1, wherein said system further comprises:light means for illuminating said user's eye with diffuse light which is circularly polarized in a given sense of rotation to derive diffusely reflected light from said user's eye that is incident on said lens.
 4. The system of claim 3, wherein said light means comprises:an array of light sources which surround said imager for deriving illuminating light; a diffuser panel through which said illuminating light from said array of light sources passes prior to reflection from the user's eye, said diffuser panel having a hole therein situated with respect to said lens for permitting said reflected light to reach said lens without passing through said diffuser panel; and a circular polarizer situated in front of said diffuser panel and said lens for circularly polarizing the illuminating light reaching said user's eye in said given sense of rotation.
 5. The system of claim 3, further comprising:a digital frame grabber coupled to said imager for deriving digital data representative of said focused image of said eye of a user.
 6. The system of claim 1, wherein said imager is a relatively high-resolution, narrow-field imager and said alignment means further comprises:a relatively low-resolution, wide field imager for deriving successive video frames of image information that includes predetermined facial features of said user; image processing means responsive to said predetermined-facial-feature image information for locating the position of said user's eye in said video frames thereof; and means associated with said image processing means which is responsive to the location of the position of said user's eye in said video frames of said low-resolution, wide field imager for permitting said high-resolution, narrow field imager to be provided with a focused image of said user's eye.
 7. The system of claim 6, wherein:said means associated with said image processing means includes an active mirror positioned in accordance with said located position of said user's eye in said video frames of said relatively low-resolution, wide field imager.
 8. The system of claims 6, wherein said imaging processing means includes:a Gaussian pyramid for deriving a multistage image pyramid of at least one of said successive video frames of image information; and means responsive to said image-pyramid stages for deriving a change energy pyramid.
 9. In a system including an imager having a lens for deriving a focused image of an eye of a user of the system to examine the iris of said user's eye, the improvement comprising:alignment means for permitting said user to self-position his or her eye into said imager's field of view without the need for any physical contact with said system; a digital frame grabber coupled to said imager for deriving digital data representative of said focused image of said user's eye; image processing means responsive to the digital data from said frame grabber that manifests said user's eye for localizing the iris of said eye by, in sequential order, (1) locating that data which is within the image of the user's eye that defines the limbic boundary of said iris, (2) locating that data which is within said limbic boundary that defines the pupilary boundary of said iris, (3) locating that data which is within said limbic boundary that defines the boundaries of the upper and lower eyelids of said eye, and (4) then employing that data that is outside of said pupilary boundary, inside said limbic boundary, and below the upper eyelid and above the lower eyelid thereby to delimit said data to that portion thereof which manifests the iris of said eye, the image processing means comprising:(a) gradient-based edge detector filter means tuned in orientation to favor near verticality for deriving detected edge data; and (b) means, responsive to said limbic boundary being modeled as a circle parameterized by its two center coordinates, xc and yc, and its radius, r, for thinning and then histogramming said detected edge data into a three-dimensional (xc, yc, r)-space, according to permissible (xc, yc, r) values for a given (x, y) image location; whereby the (xc, yc, r) point with the maximal number of votes is taken to represent the limbic boundary.
 10. In a system including an imager having a lens for deriving a focused image of an eye of a user of the system to examine the iris of said user's eye, the improvement comprising:alignment means for permitting said user to self-position his or her eye into said imager's field of view without the need for any physical contact with said system; a digital frame grabber coupled to said imager for deriving digital data representative of said focused image of said user's eye; image processing means responsive to the digital data from said frame grabber that manifests said user's eye for localizing the iris of said eye by, in sequential order, (1) locating that data which is within the image of the user's eye that defines the limbic boundary of said iris, (2) locating that data which is within said limbic boundary that defines the pupilary boundary of said iris, (3) locating that data which is within said limbic boundary that defines the boundaries of the upper and lower eyelids of said eye, and (4) then employing that data that is outside of said pupilary boundary, inside said limbic boundary, and below the upper eyelid and above the lower eyelid thereby to delimit said data to that portion thereof which manifests the iris of said eye, the image processing means comprising:(a) gradient-based edge detector filter means that is directionally untuned in orientation for deriving detected edge data; and (b) means, responsive to said pupilary boundary being modeled as a circle parameterized by its two center coordinates, xc and yc, and its radius, r, for thinning and then histogramming said detected edge data into a three-dimensional (xc, yc,r)-space, according to permissible (xc, yc,r) values for a given (x, y) image location; whereby the (xc, yc, r) point with the maximal number of votes is taken to represent the pupilary boundary.
 11. In a system including an imager having a lens for deriving a focused image of an eye of a user of the system to examine the iris of said user's eye, the improvement comprising:alignment means for permitting said user to self-position his or her eye into said imager 's field of view without the need for any physical contact with said system; a digital frame grabber coupled to said imager for deriving digital data representative of said focused image of said user's eye; image processing means responsive to the digital data from said frame grabber that manifests said user's eye for localizing the iris of said eye by, in sequential order, (1) locating that data which is within the image of the user's eye that defines the limbic boundary of said iris, (2) locating that data which is within said limbic boundary that defines the pupilary boundary of said iris, (3) locating that data which is within said limbic boundary that defines the boundaries of the upper and lower eyelids of said eye, and (4) then employing that data that is outside of said pupilary boundary, inside said limbic boundary, and below the upper eyelid and above the lower eyelid thereby to delimit said data to that portion thereof which manifests the iris of said eye, the image processing means comprising:(a) gradient-based edge detector filter means tuned in orientation to favor the horizontal for deriving detected edge data; and (b) means, responsive to each of said upper eyelid boundary and said lower eyelid boundary of said eye being modeled as a parabolic parameterized by second-order arcs, in which particular values for the parameterization are instantiated by thinning and then histogramming said detected edge data into a three-dimensional space, according to permissible values for a given image location; whereby the spatial point with the maximal number of votes is taken to represent that eyelid boundary.
 12. In a system directed to automated iris recognition for security access control including (1) an imager having a lens for deriving a focused image of an eye of a user of the system and (2) a digital frame grabber coupled to said imager for deriving digital data representative of said focused image of said user's eye, the improvement comprising:alignment means for permitting said user to self-position his or her eye into the field of view of said imager without the need for any physical contact with said system; and image processing means including:(a) iris-localizing means responsive to digital data from said frame grabber that manifests said user's eye for substantially delimiting said digital data to only that portion thereof which manifests solely the iris of said user's eye; and (b) pattern-matching means, responsive to said portion of said digital data and previously stored digital data which manifests solely the iris of an eye of a given individual, said pattern-matching means employing normalized spatial correlation, for:(1) first comparing, at each of a plurality of spatial scales, each of distinctive spatial characteristics of the respective irises of said user and said given individual that are spatially registered with one another to quantitatively determine, at each of said plurality of spatial scales, a goodness value of match at that spatial scale, and then (2) judging whether or not the pattern of said delimited digital data which manifests solely said iris of said user's eye matches said digital data which manifests solely the iris of the eye of said given individual in accordance with a certain combination of the quantitatively-determined goodness values of match at each of said plurality of spatial scales, the pattern matching means comprising:area-based image registration means utilizing a mapping function (u(x,y),v(x,y)) constrained to be a similarity transformation of translational shift, scale and rotation, such that, for all (x,y), the data value at (x,y)-(u(x,y),v(x,y)) in the delimited digital data which manifests solely said iris of said user's eye is close to that at (x,y) of said digital data which manifests solely the iris of the eye of said given individual.
 13. In a system directed to automated iris recognition for security access control including (1) an imager having a lens for deriving a focused image of an eye of a user of the system and (2) a digital frame grabber coupled to said imager for deriving digital data representative of said focused image of said user's eye, the improvement comprising:alignment means for permitting said user to self-position his or her eye into field of view of said imager without the need for any physical contact with said system; and image processing means including:(a) iris-localizing means responsive to digital data from said frame grabber that manifests said user's eye for substantially delimiting said digital data to only that portion thereof which manifests solely said iris of said user's eye; and (b) pattern-matching means, responsive to said portion of said digital data and previously stored digital data which manifests solely the iris of an eye of a given individual, said pattern-matching means employing normalized spatial correlation, for:(1) first comparing, at each of a plurality of spatial scales, each of distinctive spatial characteristics of the respective irises of said user and said given individual that are spatially registered with one another to quantitatively determine, at each of said plurality of spatial scales, a goodness value of match at that spatial scale, and then (2) judging whether or not the pattern of said delimited digital data which manifests solely said iris of said user's eye matches said digital data which manifests solely the iris of the eye of said given individual in accordance with a certain combination of the quantitatively-determined goodness values of match at each of said plurality of spatial scales, the pattern matching means comprising:means for combining the quantitatively-determined goodness values of match at each of said plurality of spatial scales so that the variance within various instances of the same iris is minimized and the variance within various instances of different irises is maximized.
 14. The system of claim 13, wherein:said means for combining the quantitatively-determined goodness values of match at each of said plurality of spatial scales employs Fisher's Linear Discriminant as a linear function that minimizes the variance among various instances of the same iris and maximizes the variance among various instances of different irises.
 15. In an image-processing method responsive to digital data defining a digitized image of the eye of an individual for delimiting said digital data to that portion thereof that defines the iris of said eye of said individual to the relative exclusion of other components of the eye of the individual, said method comprising the steps of:a delimiting step of locating that data which is within the image of said individual's eye that define the limbic boundary of said iris, the pupilary boundary of said iris, and the boundaries of the upper and lower eyelids of said eye, the delimiting step includes the sequential steps of:(a) first, locating that portion of said digital data that defines the limbic boundary of said iris, step (a) includes the steps of:(i) employing gradient-based edge detector filter means tuned in orientation to favor near verticality for detecting edge data; and (ii) thinning and then histogramming said detected edge data into a three-dimensional (xc, yc, r)-space, according to permissible (xc, yc, r) values for a given (x, y) image location in accordance with a model of said limbic boundary as a circle parameterized by its two center coordinates, xc and yc, and its radius r, the histogramming step embodies a voting scheme which produces votes for recovering said limbic boundary; whereby the (xc, yc, r) point with the maximal number of the votes is taken to represent the limbic boundary; (b) second, locating that portion of said digital data which is within said limbic boundary that defines the pupilary boundary of said iris; (c) third, locating that portion of said digital data which is within said limbic boundary that defines the boundaries of the upper and lower eyelids of said eye; and (d) fourth, employing only that portion of said digital data that is outside of said pupilary boundary, inside said limbic boundary, and below the upper eyelid and above the lower eyelid thereby to delimit said digital data to that portion thereof which manifests said iris of said eye; the delimiting step further includes the steps of:(e) image-filtering said one of the limbic boundary of said iris, the pupilary boundary of said iris, and the boundaries of said upper and lower eyelids to derive an enhanced image thereof; and (f) histogramming said enhanced image, in which said histogramming step embodies the voting scheme for recovering one of the boundaries of the iris from said enhanced image; whereby said recovery of said one of the boundaries of said iris does not require knowledge of any initial conditions other than the digital data defining said digitized image of said eye of said individual.
 16. In an image-processing method responsive to digital data defining a digitized image of the eye of an individual for delimiting said digital data to that portion thereof that defines the iris of said eye of said individual to the relative exclusion of other components of the eye of the individual; said method comprising the steps of:a delimiting step of locating that data which is within the image of said individual's eye that define the limbic boundary of said iris, the pupilary boundary of said iris, and the boundaries of the upper and lower eyelids of said eye, the delimiting step includes the sequential steps of:(a) first, locating that portion of said digital data that defines the limbic boundary of said iris; (b) second, locating that portion of said digital data which is within said limbic boundary that defines the pupilary boundary of said iris; (c) third, locating that portion of said digital data which is within said limbic boundary that defines the boundaries of the upper and lower eyelids of said eye; and (d) fourth, employing only that portion of said digital data that is outside of said pupilary boundary, inside said limbic boundary, and below the upper eyelid and above the lower eyelid thereby to delimit said digital data to that portion thereof which manifests said iris of said eye, step (d) includes the steps of:(i) employing gradient-based edge detector filter means that is directionally untuned in orientation for detecting edge data; and (ii) thinning and then histogramming said detected edge data into a three-dimensional (xc, yc, r)-space, according to permissible (xc, yc, r) values for a given (x, y) image location in accordance with a model of said pupilary boundary as a circle parameterized by its two center coordinates, xc, and yc, and its radius r, the histogramming step embodies a voting scheme which produces votes for recovering said limbic boundary; whereby the (xc, yc, r) point with the maximal number of the votes is taken to represent the pupilary boundary; the delimiting step further includes the steps of:(e) image-filtering said one of the limbic boundary of said iris, the pupilary boundary of said iris, and the boundaries of said upper and lower eyelids to derive an enhanced image thereof; and (f) histogramming said enhanced image, in which said histogramming step embodies the voting scheme for recovering one of the boundaries of the iris from said enhanced image; whereby said recovery of said one of the boundaries of the iris does not require knowledge of any initial conditions other than the digital data defining said digitized image of said eye of said individual.
 17. In an image-processing method responsive to digital data defining a digitized image of an eye of an individual for delimiting said digital data to that portion thereof that defines solely the iris of said eye of said individual; wherein said method includes a delimiting step of locating that data which is within the image of said individual's eye that defines at least one of the limbic boundary of said iris, the pupilary boundary of said iris, and the boundaries of upper and lower eyelids of said eye; said delimiting step comprising the steps of:a) image-filtering said one of the limbic boundary of said iris, the pupilary boundary of said iris, and the boundaries of said upper and lower eyelids to derive an enhanced image thereof; b) histogramming said enhanced image, in which said histogramming step embodies a voting scheme for recovering said one of said iris boundaries from said enhanced image; said delimiting step further including the sequential steps of: c) first, locating that portion of said digital data that defines said limbic boundary of said iris; d) second, locating that portion of said digital data which is within said limbic boundary that defines said pupilary boundary of said iris; e) third, locating that portion of said digital data which is within said limbic boundary that defines said boundaries of said upper and lower eyelids of said eye by:(1) employing gradient-based edge detector filter means tuned in orientation to favor the horizontal for detecting edge data; and (2) thinning and then histogramming said detected edge data into a three-dimensional space, according to permissible values for a given image location in accordance with a model of each of the upper eyelid boundary and the lower eyelid boundary as a parabolic parameterized by second-order arcs; whereby the spatial point with the maximal number of votes is taken to represent that eyelid boundary; and f) fourth, employing only that portion of said digital data that is outside of said pupilary boundary, inside said limbic boundary, and below the upper eyelid and above the lower eyelid thereby to delimit said digital data to that portion thereof which manifests the iris of the eye; whereby said recovery of said one of said iris boundaries does not require knowledge of any initial conditions other than the digital data defining said digitized image of said eye of said individual.
 18. In an image-processing method for use in providing automated iris recognition for security access control; said method being responsive to first digital data defining a digitized image of the iris of the eye of a certain individual to the relative exclusion of other components of the eye of the certain individual attempting access and previously stored second digital data of a digitized image that defines the iris of the eye of a specified individual to the relative exclusion of other components of the eye of the specified individual; said method comprising the steps of:a pattern-matching step which comprises the steps of: a) employing normalized spatial correlation for first comparing, at each of a plurality of spatial scales, each of distinctive spatial characteristics of the respective irises of said given individual and said specified individual that are spatially registered with one another to quantitatively determine, at each of said plurality of spatial scales, a goodness value of match at that spatial scale; andb) judging whether or not the pattern of said digital data which manifests said iris of said eye of said given individual matches said digital data which manifests the iris of an eye of said specified individual in accordance with a certain combination of the quantitatively-determined goodness values of match at each of said plurality of spatial scales.
 19. In an image-processing method for use in providing automated iris recognition for security access control; said method being responsive to first digital data defining a digitized image of solely the iris of the eye of a certain individual attempting access and previously stored second digital data of a digitized image that defines solely the iris of the eye of a specified individual; said method comprising the steps of:a pattern-matching step which comprises the steps of:a) employing normalized spatial correlation for first comparing, at each of a plurality of spatial scales, each of distinctive spatial characteristics of the respective irises of said given individual and said specified individual that are spatially registered with one another to quantitatively determine, at each of said plurality of spatial scales, a goodness value of match at that spatial scale, where step a) comprises the step of:employing area-based image registration utilizing a mapping function (u(x,y),v(x,y)) constrained to be a similarity transformation of translational shift, scale and rotation, such that, for all (x,y), the data value at (x,y)-(u(x,y),v(x,y)) in the first digital data which manifests solely said iris of said eye of said given individual is close to that at (x,y) of said second digital data which manifests solely the iris of the eye of said specified individual; b) judging whether or not the pattern of said digital data which manifests solely said iris of said eye of said given individual matches said digital data which manifests solely the iris of an eye of said specified individual in accordance with a certain combination of the quantitatively-determined goodness values of match at each of said plurality of spatial scales.
 20. The method of claim 18, wherein step (a) comprises the step of:c) performing normalized spatial correlation over given spatial blocks made up of a first plurality of data points in a first spatial dimension of each of said plurality of scales and a second plurality of data points in a second spatial dimension of each of said plurality of scales.
 21. The method of claim 20, wherein step (c) comprises the step of:d) combining said normalized spatial correlation over said given spatial blocks via a median statistic at each of said plurality of spatial scales for quantitatively determining said goodness value of match at that spatial scale.
 22. In an image-processing method for use in providing automated iris recognition for security access control; said method being responsive to first digital data defining a digitized image of solely the iris of the eye of a certain individual attempting access and previously stored second digital data of a digitized image that defines solely the iris of the eye of a specified individual; said method comprising the steps of:a pattern-matching step which comprises the steps of:a) employing normalized spatial correlation for first comparing, at each of a plurality of spatial scales, each of distinctive spatial characteristics of the respective irises of said given individual and said specified individual that are spatially registered with one another to quantitatively determine, at each of said plurality of spatial scales, a goodness value of match at that spatial scale; b) judging whether or not the pattern of said digital data which manifests solely said iris of said eye of said given individual matches said digital data which manifests solely the iris of an eye of said specified individual in accordance with a certain combination of the quantitatively-determined goodness values of match at each of said plurality of spatial scales by combining the quantitatively-determined goodness values of match at each of said plurality of spatial scales so that the variance within various instances of the same iris is minimized and the variance within various instances of different irises is maximized.
 23. The method of claim 22, wherein step (c) comprises the step of:d) employing Fisher's Linear Discriminant as a linear function that minimized the variance among various instances of the same iris and maximizes the variance amount various instances of different irises.
 24. In a system directed to automated iris recognition for security access control including (1) an imager having a lens for deriving a focused image of an eye of a user of the system and (2) a digital frame grabber coupled to said imager for deriving digital data representative of said focused image of said user's eye, the improvement comprising:alignment means for permitting said user to self-position his or her eye into said imager's field of view without the need for any physical contact with said system; and image processing means including:(a) iris-localizing means responsive to digital data from said frame grabber that manifests said user's eye for substantially delimiting said digital data to only that portion thereof which manifests said iris of said user's eye to the relative exclusion of other components of the user's eye; and (b) pattern-matching means, responsive to said portion of said digital data and previously stored digital data which manifests the iris of an eye of a given individual to the relative exclusion of other components of the eye of the individual, said pattern-matching means employing normalized spatial correlation, for:(1) first comparing, at each of a plurality of spatial scales, each of distinctive spatial characteristics of the respective irises of said user and said given individual that are spatially registered with one another to quantitatively determine, at each of said plurality of spatial scales, a goodness value of match at that spatial scale, and then (2) judging whether or not the pattern of said delimited digital data which manifests said iris of said user's eye matches said digital data which manifests the iris of the eye of said given individual in accordance with a certain combination of the quantitatively-determined goodness values of match at each of said plurality of spatial scales.
 25. The system of claim 1, further comprising an imaging path between the imager and the user's eye, wherein the first edge means and the second edge means are positioned outside of the imaging path.
 26. In a system directed to automated iris recognition for security access control including (1) an imager having a lens for deriving a focused image of an eye of a user of the system and (2) a digital frame grabber coupled to said imager for deriving digital data representative of said focused image of said user's eye, the improvement comprising:image processing means including:(a) iris-localizing means responsive to digital data from said frame grabber that manifests said user's eye for substantially delimiting said digital data to that portion thereof which manifests said iris of said user's eye to the relative exclusion of other components of the user's eye; and (b) pattern-matching means, responsive to said portion of said digital data and previously stored digital data which manifests the iris of an eye of a given individual to the relative exclusion of other components of the eye of the given individual, said pattern-matching means employing normalized spatial correlation, for:(1) first comparing, at each of a plurality of spatial scales, each of distinctive spatial characteristics of the respective irises of said user and said given individual that are spatially registered with one another to quantitatively determine, at each of said plurality of spatial scales, a goodness value of match at that spatial scale, and then (2) judging whether or not the pattern of said delimited digital data which manifests said iris of said user's eye matches said digital data which manifests the iris of the eye of said given individual in accordance with a certain combination of the quantitatively-determined goodness values of match at each of said plurality of spatial scales, the pattern matching means comprising:area-based image registration means utilizing a mapping function (u(x,y),v(x,y)) constrained to be a similarity transformation of translational shift, scale and rotation, such that, for all (x,y), the data value at (x,y)-(u(x,y),v(x,y)) in the delimited digital data which manifests said iris of said user's eye is close to that at (x,y) of said digital data which manifests the iris of an eye of said given individual.
 27. In a system directed to automated iris recognition for security access control including (1) an imager having a lens for deriving a focused image of an eye of a user of the system and (2) a digital frame grabber coupled to said imager for deriving digital data representative of said focused image of said user's eye, the improvement comprising:image processing means including:(a) iris-localizing means responsive to digital data from said frame grabber that manifests said user's eye for substantially delimiting said digital data to only that portion thereof which manifests said iris of said user's eye to the relative exclusion of other components of the user's eye; and (b) pattern-matching means, responsive to said portion of said digital data and previously stored digital data which manifests the iris of an eye of a given individual to the relative exclusion of other components of the eye of the given individual, said pattern-matching means employing normalized spatial correlation, for:(1) first comparing, at each of a plurality of spatial scales, each of distinctive spatial characteristics of the respective irises of said user and said given individual that are spatially registered with one another to quantitatively determine, at each of said plurality of spatial scales, a goodness value of match at that spatial scale, and then (2) judging whether or not the pattern of said delimited digital data which manifests said iris of said user's eye matches said digital data which manifests the iris of the eye of said given individual in accordance with a certain combination of the quantitatively-determined goodness values of match at each of said plurality of spatial scales, the pattern matching means comprising:means for combining the quantitatively-determined goodness values of match at each of said plurality of spatial scales so that the variance within various instances of the same iris is minimized and the variance within various instances of different irises is maximized.
 28. In an image-processing method responsive to digital data defining a digitized image of an eye of an individual for delimiting said digital data to that portion thereof that defines the iris of said eye of said individual to the relative exclusion of other components of the eye of said individual; wherein said method includes a delimiting step of locating that data which is within the image of said individual's eye that defines at least one of the limbic boundary of said iris, the pupilary boundary of said iris, and the boundaries of upper and lower eyelids of said eye; said delimiting step comprising the steps of:a) image-filtering said one of the limbic boundary of said iris, the pupilary boundary of said iris, and the boundaries of said upper and lower eyelids to derive an enhanced image thereof; b) histogramming said enhanced image, in which said histogramming step embodies a voting scheme for recovering said one of said iris boundaries from said enhanced image; said delimiting step further including the sequential steps of: c) first, locating that portion of said digital data that defines said limbic boundary of said iris; d) second, locating that portion of said digital data which is within said limbic boundary that defines said pupilary boundary of said iris; e) third, locating that portion of said digital data which is within said limbic boundary that defines said boundaries of the upper and lower eyelids of said eye by:(1) employing gradient-based edge detector filter means tuned in orientation to favor the horizontal for detecting edge data; and (2) thinning and then histogramming said detected edge data into a three-dimensional space, according to permissible values for a given image location in accordance with a model of each of'said upper eyelid boundary and lower eyelid boundary as a parabolic parameterized by second-order arcs; whereby the spatial point with the maximal number of votes is taken to represent that eyelid boundary; and f) fourth, employing that portion of said digital data that is outside of said pupilary boundary, inside said limbic boundary, and below the upper eyelid and above the lower eyelid thereby to delimit said digital data to that portion thereof which manifests the iris of said eye; whereby said recovery of said one of said iris boundaries does not require knowledge of any initial conditions other than the digital data defining said digitized image of said eye of said individual.
 29. In an image-processing method for use in providing automated iris recognition for security access control; said method being responsive to first digital data defining a digitized image of the iris of the eye of a certain individual to the relative exclusion of other components of the eye of said certain individual attempting access and previously stored second digital data of a digitized image that defines the iris of the eye of a specified individual to the relative exclusion of other components of the eye of said specified individual; said method comprising the steps of:a pattern-matching step which comprises the steps of:a) employing normalized spatial correlation for first comparing, at each of a plurality of spatial scales, each of distinctive spatial characteristics of the respective irises of said given individual and said specified individual that are spatially registered with one another to quantitatively determine, at each of said plurality of spatial scales, a goodness value of match at that spatial scale, using area-based image registration utilizing a mapping function (u(x,y),v(x,y)) constrained to be a similarity transformation of translational shift, scale and rotation, such that, for all (x,y), the data value at (x,y)-(u(x,y),v(x,y)) in the first digital data which manifests said iris of said eye of said given individual is close to that at (x,y) of said second digital data which manifests the iris of the eye of said specified individual; b) judging whether or not the pattern of said digital data which manifests said iris of said eye of said given individual matches said digital data which manifests the iris of an eye of said specified individual in accordance with a certain combination of the quantitatively-determined goodness values of match at each of said plurality of spatial scales.
 30. In an image-processing method for use in providing automated iris recognition for security access control; said method being responsive to first digital data defining a digitized image of the iris of the eye of a certain individual to the relative exclusion of other components of the eye of said specified individual attempting access and previously stored second digital data of a digitized image that defines the iris of the eye of a specified individual to the relative exclusion of other components of the eye of said specified individual, said method comprising the steps of:a pattern-matching step which comprises the steps of:a) employing normalized spatial correlation for first comparing, at each of a plurality of spatial scales, each of distinctive spatial characteristics of the respective irises of said given individual and said specified individual that are spatially registered with one another to quantitatively determine, at each of said plurality of spatial scales, a goodness value of match at that spatial scale; b) judging whether or not the pattern of said digital data which manifests said iris of said eye of said given individual matches said digital data which manifests the iris of an eye of said specified individual in accordance with a certain combination of the quantitatively-determined goodness values of match at each of said plurality of spatial scales by combining the quantitatively-determined goodness values of match at each of said plurality of spatial scales so that the variance within various instances of the same iris is minimized and the variance within various instances of different irises is maximized.
 31. The system of claim 24, wherein:said pattern-matching means includes means for performing normalized spatial correlation over given spatial blocks made up of a first plurality of data points in a first spatial dimension of each of said plurality of scales and a second plurality of data points in a second spatial dimension of each of said plurality of scales.
 32. The system of claim 31, wherein:said pattern-matching means includes means combining said normalized spatial correlation over said given spatial blocks via a median statistic at each of said plurality of spatial scales for quantitatively determining said goodness value of match at that spatial scale. 